Originally at http://tracking.feedpress.it/link/9375/2904459
Posted by ronell-smith
[Estimated read time: 17 minutes]
A couple of years back, I received a call from the CMO of a small but popular and growing startup about taking on the brand as a content strategist. While I was initially lukewarm to the idea, they were adamant about working together, feeling that I “could help them reach their goals.”
Before hanging up the phone, I asked him to email me the main priority for the onsite content:
“Engaging content (e.g., shares, likes, tweets, etc.),” she wrote.
I thought, I can do engaging.
I reasoned I’d stick with how-to information content, in-depth evergreen content, and maybe a few interviews. In the online marketing vertical, these are what I call “can’t miss elements” for brands looking to create onsite engagement.
But not long after I started working with the brand, I saw some problems that should have been red flags from the beginning:
The type of content they wanted for the blog didn’t garner traffic
The type of content that did garner traffic didn’t garner engagement
When I talked to the CMO, her words were equally confusing: “Conversions are up, but we need to see engagement improve to continue the relationship.”
I was confused.
Is there EVER a scenario where increased conversions was a negative?
Shortly thereafter, the relationship dissolved. The culprit wasn’t a lack of engaging content, though.
Engagement, alone, is a poor choice for a goal
This likely sounds familiar to folks reading this post. Maybe someone says, “We have a shiny new website, so now we need to blog.”
The next question is “Who’s going to blog?”
Then, typically, the question after that is “What do we blog about?”
Someone always, and I do mean always, says, “About what we do. You kno…
For Your Full SEO Site Report visit http://nationwideseo.com.au/site-report/